Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(10): e0105722, 2022 Oct 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36094192

RESUMO

The detection of antibodies against Histoplasma capsulatum remains a frequently relied-on approach to diagnose histoplasmosis. We retrospectively assessed the performances of complement fixation (CF) and immunodiffusion (ID) assays for anti-Histoplasma antibody detection in patients with culture-confirmed histoplasmosis at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) over a 10-year period (2011 to 2020). Among 67 culture-confirmed patients who also had H. capsulatum CF/ID testing ordered, 51 (67.1%) were immunocompromised, 34 (50.7%) had localized disease, and 51 (76.1%) presented with <3 months of symptoms before testing. H. capsulatum CF and/or ID testing was positive in 47 (70.1%) patients, with both assays being positive in 39 cases. CF was positive in 44 (65.7%) patients, with reactivity against both H. capsulatum mycelial and yeast antigens in 30 (68.2%) cases, whereas 11 (25%) and 3 (6.8%) individuals had antibodies to the CF yeast or mycelial antigen only, respectively. H. capsulatum ID was positive in 42 (62.7%) patients, with the presence of the M-band only or the H- and M-bands in 27 (64.3%) and 15 (35.7%) cases, respectively. Among 18 serially tested patients, 12 remained ID and/or CF positive at the final time point (median, 154 days; range, 20 to 480 days). Serial CF testing showed that antibodies to the mycelial antigen serorevert to negative more frequently (6/11) than antibodies to the yeast antigen (2/13). There was no statistically significant difference in antibody positivity relative to patient immune status, degree of disease dissemination, or symptom duration. Serologic testing remains a valuable asset to support the diagnosis of histoplasmosis, particularly when direct detection methods fail to identify an infection.


Assuntos
Histoplasmose , Onygenales , Humanos , Histoplasma , Histoplasmose/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Anticorpos Antifúngicos , Imunodifusão , Antígenos de Fungos
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(4): 1198-203, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25631806

RESUMO

Detection of the Histoplasma capsulatum urinary antigen (UAg) is among the most sensitive and rapid means to diagnose histoplasmosis. Previously, we evaluated analyte-specific reagents (ASR) manufactured by IMMY (Norman, OK) for detection of Histoplasma galactomannan (GM) in urine using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and we showed low positive agreement (64.5%) with the MiraVista (MVista) Histoplasma antigen (Ag) quantitative EIA (MiraVista Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Here we reevaluated the IMMY GM ASR following modification of our original assay protocol and introduction of an indeterminate range. A total of 150 prospectively collected urine samples were tested with both the IMMY and MVista EIAs, and clinical histories were recorded for all study subjects. The IMMY GM ASR showed positive and negative agreements of 82.3% (14/17 samples) and 100% (121/121 samples), respectively (with exclusion of 12 indeterminate results), and overall agreement of 90% (135/150 samples) with respect to the MVista EIA. Of the three patients with negative IMMY GM ASR results and positive MVista EIA results, testing was performed for initial diagnostic purposes for one patient (<0.4 ng/ml by the MVista EIA) and UAg levels were being monitored for the remaining two patients (both<0.7 ng/ml by the MVista EIA). The MVista EIA results were positive for 6/12 samples that tested indeterminate by the IMMY GM ASR. We also show that the IMMY GM ASR can be used to serially monitor Histoplasma UAg levels. In conclusion, we demonstrate that, with modification, the IMMY GM ASR is a reliable rapid assay for detection of Histoplasma UAg.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Fungos/urina , Histoplasma/isolamento & purificação , Histoplasmose/diagnóstico , Urinálise/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Feminino , Histoplasma/química , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 67(4): 346-9, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20638602

RESUMO

Serologic testing for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) IgG is traditionally performed by immunofluorescence assay or enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Although sensitive and specific, these methods are labor intensive, time consuming, and require separate assays for each analyte. This study evaluated the performance of the MMRV IgG AtheNA Multi-Lyte assay using nonclinically characterized serum specimens submitted to our laboratory for routine MMRV IgG testing. Mumps (n = 492) or rubella (n = 500) IgG were initially tested by enzyme-linked fluorescent antibody (ELFA), whereas measles (n = 494) or varicella (n = 497) were analyzed by EIA. Each sample was also tested by the AtheNA Multi-Lyte assay. Discordant results were retested by the predicate method and the multiplex assay, with further discrepancies being arbitrated by a third test. Compared to EIA/ELFA for MMRV IgG, the AtheNA assay demonstrated an overall agreement of 97.4%, 98.2%, 97.6%, and 100%, respectively. Use of this multiplex assay allows for the simultaneous detection of MMRV IgG, potentially decreasing cost, sample volume requirements, aliquot errors, and hands-on testing time.


Assuntos
Anticorpos/sangue , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Sarampo/diagnóstico , Caxumba/diagnóstico , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/diagnóstico , Virologia/métodos , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Vírus do Sarampo/imunologia , Microesferas , Vírus da Caxumba/imunologia , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Vírus da Rubéola/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...